2009 was not the best year for Petina Gappah the person: I went through some rather horrible and painful stuff that is best forgotten. What I will focus on is 2009 as a terrific year for Petina Gappah the writer: it being, in case you missed it (and how could you, when I was shouting about it from every rooftop) the year that An Elegy for Easterly, my first book, was published.
When the year began, I was nervous and excited. I had a calender in which I crossed off the days to April, when the book was to be published. Then April came, and it was not the cruellest month of my nightmares. The book was published, to, as they say, critical acclaim. I then had the surreal experience of travelling around the world and seeing it everywhere. Everyone I knew, it seemed, was reading it. Everyone but me.
I had last read my book at the proofreading stage in November 2008, and I was afraid to read it again after it was published in case I found that I could have written a particular sentence better, or chosen a different and better word. So I read only those bits that I had to read as part of my promotional activities. Only two weeks ago, after I won the Guardian First Book Award, did I read it again from cover to cover in one sitting. More on this re-reading anon.
What surprised me this year where the reviews. I found it difficult to believe that this book, this accidental book, was a book that serious people were taking seriously. And I was amused by the comparisons: I was compared to all manner of writers including VS Naipaul, Chekhov and Zora Neale Hurston, all very flattering, if a little hyperbolic.
One of the reasons that I am so insistent that my work be judged on its merits, and not on my identity as an "African writer" is that I sometimes get the uneasy sense that there is a sort of affirmative action in publishing, that work by writers of colour is not examined critically, it is examined mainly in terms of the "authenticity" and identity of the writer. There is something that feels like the unconsious racism of lowered expectations, where something that should be judged on its merits is judged instead on whether it is "authentic". I was worried, therefore, by the reviews that seemed to focus more on the fact that the stories are about Zimbabwe, than on whether they are any good.
Mercifully, there were not too many of these, but you will understand how happy I am to read again and again my favourite review which came from a writer I hold in the highest esteem, a writer who focused not on the Zimbabweanness of my stories but on my craft as a writer. In a thoughtful and considered review essay on the short story, James Lasdun gave me a lot to think about. He very correctly said my book was uneven, which it absolutely is. Best of all, he confirmed for me that I can do this, that I should follow the instinct that tells me that the short story, the lonely and sometimes arid field that it is, is worth ploughing.
Which takes me to re-reading my book. I reread it two weeks ago, with all the reviews in mind. I was pleased to see that I have nothing to be ashamed of, that I have a book that I can defend. Some of the stories are flawed, and I see what I could have done better, but obviously, I cannot rewrite them now to make them better. I can build on them, however, and with what I have learned from the critics, and from readers, I can eliminate some weaknesses. Every writer, I think, knows what they do best, and I am really pleased to have my strengths confirmed: my ability to take on any voice, my interest in everything and everyone, my ability to both move and amuse. So I will take all I have learnt this year in the hope of becoming a better writer, or at least, in the hope that the next book will be better than the first.
I ended the year as well as I began it, on top of that wonderful award, to my very great delight, I made a number of Best of 2009 lists. The one listing that moved me the most, the one that I will print out and put on my fridge and look at in cases of future writerly angst and doubt is this, from NPR's best of debut fiction for 2009:
Gappah is an earthy, evocative stylist, with a startling range of storytelling styles. "Hotel California" unfolds as a tale within a tale, while "The Negotiated Settlement," one of the more moving stories within the collection, lays bare a marriage in beautiful imagery. "First you undo me this scar," says the narrator's wife, "then we can talk about divorce." A writer who can strike bone this solidly can tell us just about anything.
It is strange and beautiful when someone, a perfect stranger, looks into your soul and reveals what you suspected about yourself but were too unsure to voice. This reviewer has seen what I always believed about myself, but never had the confidence to say: I believe that I can write about anything I put my mind to. Anything at all. In anyone's voice. I am going to spend the rest of my life proving it, if only to myself.
But that is for the long term: for now, I want to say thank you all for being with me on my amazing adventure as a writer in this last year. I hide it well, but for the most part, I have been wracked with nerves and doubt. I am pleased that I had this blog, that I had you, my readers and my good friends, with your cheery good wishes and your generosity. Please join me next year as I update you on my next book, and on my new stories, which I promise to make even better than those in Easterly. Happy new year, near and dear ones, far and wide!



